Whirlpool Corporation v. Filters Fast. LLC (W.D. North Carolina). Successfully represented Whirlpool Corporation in a trademark infringement and unfair competition action resulting in jury verdict in favor Whirlpool and damages award of $5.8 million.
In the Matter of Certain Food Supplements and Vitamins Including Ocular Antioxidants and Components Thereof, Investigation No. 337-TA-1027 (U.S. International Trade Commission) and OmniActive Health Technologies, Inc. v. Kemin Industries, Inc., 216cv04988 (D. N.J.). Represented Complainant Kemin Industries, Inc. in a patent infringement litigation before the ITC and the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, involving ocular antioxidants.
JT&O Technologies, LLC v. Continental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Extreme Outdoor Products et al. (E.D. Tenn.). Represented Defendants Dick’s Sporting Goods and XOP in patent litigation concerning tree stands.
Swanson v. ALZA Corp. (N.D. Cal.). Represented ALZA Corp., a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, in an inventorship dispute pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where ALZA Corp. prevailed on summary judgment.
Deere & Company v. Duroc LLC et al. (S.D. Iowa). Represented Deere & Company in a patent infringement trial concerning dual deck flex-wing rotary cutters in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics , No. 20101406 (Fed. Cir.). Represented Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) as amicus curiae before the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning the patent eligibility of isolated human genes.
Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Gannett Co., Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.); Augme Technologies, Inc. v. AOL Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.); and Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Tacoda, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.). Represented AOL in three related patent infringement cases where the plaintiff asserted four patents against AOL’s targeted web advertising technology.
Garnet Digital, LLC v. Apple, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.). Represented Hewlett-Packard in patent litigation brought by Garnet Digital involving technology related to video streaming on a mobile device.
King Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. (D. Del.). Represented King Pharmaceuticals in patent litigation against Teva enforcing King’s patents, which covered King’s life-saving EpiPen® Auto-Injector products.
Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al., 09cv8441 (C.D. Cal.). Represented Hewlett-Packard in a patent infringement case involving patents concerning network gateway devices.
MedioStream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp et al., 3:11cv2525 (N.D. Cal.). Represented Microsoft Corp. in a patent litigation action involving patents concerning multimedia conversion technology.
In the Matter of Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-775 (U.S. International Trade Commission). Successful representation of Hewlett-Packard and Apple Inc. in patent infringement litigation involving wireless communication systems, resulting in complainant withdrawing its complaint.
Represented a pharmaceutical research company in Hatch-Waxman litigation against multiple defendants in multiple federal courts.
Advised client regarding technology transfer agreement and related Bayh-Dole issues.
Performed due diligence and pre-litigation assessment of patent portfolio on behalf of an ecommerce company.
Provided client counseling and due diligence opinion to a pharmaceutical research company concerning submissions to the Food and Drug Administration.
Representation of a seed manufacturer in litigation related to genetically modified crops, involving patent, antitrust, and breach of contract claims.
In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices Including Handheld Wireless Communication Devices, Investigation No. 337-TA-673 (U.S. International Trade Commission). Represented Respondent Samsung in Patent infringement litigation before the ITC involving handheld wireless devices.
Represented a pharmaceutical research company in Hatch-Waxman litigation related to a pharmacologic stress agent.
